![]() ![]() ![]() As anyone who has read anything from Horner and Scanella over the past eight years can attest, arguing for a direct ancestor-descendant relationship for dinosaurs is difficult to do and even harder to win over others in the field. Interestingly, this part of the paper should have been the most controversial. I thought that the authors put forth a compelling argument for this anagenic event and backed up their position well. The authors argue, based on skull shape and chronostratigraphic position, that D. argue for the designation of a new Daspletosaurus species, D. New Tyrannosaur with Evidence for Anagenesis and Crocodile-Like Facial Sensory System. torosus.Ĭarr, T.D., Varricchio, D.J., Sedlmayr, J.C., Roberts, E.M., Moore, J.R. rex of course.įirst, in March, we saw the release of a paper detailing a new species of Daspletosaurus and its relationship to D. Two papers dropped in the past three months that have put the brakes on a recent trend in paleo-art. This has certainly been an interesting year. Tyrannosaurus rex walking towards camera. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |